Wednesday, 23 April 2014

Empat ADUN Selangor melawat empangan Sg Selangor





Pagi tadi empat ADUN Selangor melawat empangan Sungai Selangor dan mendengar taklimat dari Splash mengenai paras air yang rendah di empangan Sungai Selangor.

Monday, 21 April 2014

Sdr Karpal, we miss you!


Tiada perkataan yang sesuai untuk menggambarkan rasa kehilangan Sdr Karpal Singh selain daripada mengikuti perarakan pengembumian yang amat bermakna ini.

无法找到任何贴切的字眼来形容失去卡巴星的感受,唯一能做到的是跟着队伍送卡巴星意义非凡的最后一程。


20 Apr 2014

Saturday, 19 April 2014

Perasmian mercu tanda baru Rasa


Sdr Ean Yan Hian Wah officiating the new landmark of Rasa.

欧阳捍华主持叻思新地标启动仪式。

Sdr Ean Yan Hian Wah merasmikan mercu tanda baru Rasa.

Friday, 18 April 2014

蕉赖皇冠城湖边公园悼念卡巴星同志 We miss you, Sdr Karpal!







































昨晚沙登和乌冷的公众纷纷到蕉赖皇冠城湖畔向卡巴星致最后的敬意,这样的烛光悼念会将在今晚9点至11点在同样的地点举行。

Orang ramai dari Serdang dan Hulu Langat memberi penghormatan terakhir kepada mendiang Karpal Singh di Bandar Mahkota Cheras semalam. Acara sedemikian akan diadakan di tempat yang sama juga pada jam 9 hingga 11 malam hari ini.

Thursday, 17 April 2014

The last media statement that I received from the late Mr Karpal


Mr karpal’s office always emailed us the statements issued by Mr Karpal. This is the last statement that I received from the late Mr Karpal.

MEDIA STATEMENT

The appointment of Muhammad Shafee Abdullah to act for the Registrar of Societies (ROS) in the civil application filed by the DAP against the ROS, clearly, reflects the Attorney-General, Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail, has abdicated his functions, particularly so in the wake of the recent appointment of Muhammad Shafee Abdullah to act in the criminal appeal involving Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim recently in the Court of Appeal.

These appointments do not speak well of the Attorney-General’s Chambers. Is the Attorney-General Chambers so devoid of personnel of caliber to attend to prosecutions and civil proceedings in courts? Must the tax-payer, in addition to be responsible for the salaries and other benefits for those employed in the Attorney-General’s Chambers, also make provision for payment to Muhammad Shafee Abdullah for his services as an advocate and solicitor to the Attorney-General’s Chambers. What is the need for the duplication of these monetary benefits at the expense of the tax-payer?

No doubt, section 24(3) of the Government Proceedings Act, 1956 [attached] provides for the retaining of an advocate and solicitor by the Attorney-General to represent a Federal Officer in civil proceedings in court. However, that provision should only be invoked in exceptional cases where the expertise required in court is not available in the Attorney-General’s Chambers.

The civil proceedings against the ROS do not require any special expertise. Therefore, the appointment of Muhammad Shafee Abdullah at the expense of the tax-payer is unwarranted and an unnecessary burden on the tax-payer and his appointment should, accordingly, be revoked. The earlier it is done, the better for the tax-payer and the national interest.

In the meanwhile, I call upon the Attorney-General to publicly explain why Muhammad Shafee Abdullah was appointed and the state the remuneration agreed to be paid to him.

Dated 10th April, 2014
KARPAL SINGH
Member of Parliament
Bukit Gelugor